This research introduces a machine learning framework, utilizing minimal input data, to accurately forecast neighborhood energy use during early design stages, enabling sustainable and efficient urban planning.
Cities are at the forefront of energy consumption and carbon emissions, responsible for a staggering 75% of global emissions. As urban populations grow, finding ways to design energy-efficient neighborhoods becomes critical. Enter machine learning (ML), the game-changer that simplifies and enhances the process of predicting energy use during the earliest stages of design.
In a recent study, researchers proposed a novel framework that integrates ML into neighborhood planning. The framework uses minimal input data to forecast energy consumption, empowering architects and planners to make eco-friendly decisions right from the start.
The study focuses on Phase 1 of a three-phase framework:
At the core of Phase 1 is the CatBoost Regressor, a cutting-edge ML model that predicts energy use intensity (EUI) based on minimal inputs like building size, activity type, number of floors, and climate zone. And the results? An impressive predictive accuracy of 88%!
What makes this ML model shine is its ability to simplify input requirements without compromising accuracy. Here's what the model considers:
This approach not only accelerates the design process but also ensures sustainability is baked into the blueprint.
The framework was tested using real-world data from New York City, comparing ML predictions to traditional energy modeling tools like Grasshopper and Honeybee. The results showed a minimal error range of -8.69% to 11.04%, proving ML's reliability in real-world applications.
Here’s a closer look at what was achieved:
While the initial phase is a significant leap forward, there’s still room to grow:
As cities strive to meet ambitious climate goals, tools like this ML framework will play a pivotal role in achieving energy-efficient urban planning.
By integrating machine learning into early design workflows, this study bridges the gap between cutting-edge technology and practical application. The result? Smarter, faster, and greener neighborhood planning that aligns with the global push toward sustainability.
So next time you see a shiny new building, think about the invisible intelligence behind its design. With tools like these, the future of urban living is not just bright—it’s sustainable.
Machine Learning (ML): A subset of AI using algorithms and statistical models to identify patterns and make decisions without explicit programming.
Energy Use Intensity (EUI): A measure of how much energy a building uses per square meter. The total energy consumed by a building annually divided by its total floor area, expressed in kWh/m².
Early Design Stage: The first steps in planning a building or neighborhood, focusing on ideas and layouts. The conceptual phase of architectural and urban planning when initial designs are developed with limited detailed data.
CatBoost Regressor: A smart computer program that predicts outcomes, especially useful when you don’t have a ton of detailed information. A gradient boosting algorithm on decision trees, optimized for categorical data and reducing overfitting.
Climate Zone: Areas with similar weather patterns that affect building energy needs, like heating or cooling. A geographical classification based on long-term climate data, influencing thermal design and energy demand.
Primary Building Activity (PBA): What a building is mainly used for, like living, working, or shopping. The dominant function or purpose of a building, categorized for energy analysis (e.g., residential, commercial).
R² Score (R-Squared): A number that shows how well predictions match reality—the closer to 1, the better! A statistical measure of the proportion of variance in a dependent variable explained by the independent variables in a model.
di Stefano, A.G.; Ruta, M.; Masera, G.; Hoque, S. Leveraging Machine Learning to Forecast Neighborhood Energy Use in Early Design Stages: A Preliminary Application. Buildings 2024, 14, 3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123866